Economy Killers?

The CPI report for May was released on Friday and it showed that headline inflation rose 8.6% from May of last year, compared with 8.3% in April. Core inflation, that is, excluding food and energy, rose at 6.0% from last year, compared with 6.2% in April. This was a little higher than expectations and the news crushed the stock and bond markets on Friday. The table below shows the trend in CPI. The categories highlighted in yellow are those that are above the headline CPI of 8.6% over the last 12 months. Food and energy inflation are real problems, but are they economy killers?

When it comes to inflation, what is core to the Fed bears little resemblance of what you and I consider core. For the Fed, core inflation excludes food and energy. The rationale is that these are generally very volatile and therefore, placing too much emphasis on food and energy prices could risk the Fed overreacting to temporary inflation. As a result, the Fed emphasizes core inflation and less so on food and energy inflation when making policy decisions.

From the perspective of consumers, food and energy is about as core as it gets. For most consumers, food and fuel are often significant proportions of what is purchased each month and this is obviously why over 70% disapprove of Biden’s handling of inflation, according to a recent ABC News/Ipsos poll.

Much of the pandemic-caused inflation was the result of a demand surge and it appears that is finally beginning to be wrung out of the system. Inventories are very high at many retailers and pushing that inventory out over coming months will require discounting, which is deflationary. Goods demand is normalizing and that eases supply chain woes. The inventory problems at Wal-Mart and Target are great examples, as is the decline in container delays from China. While much of this inflation wasn’t as transitory as the Fed would have preferred, it appears at least to be temporary.

The same can’t be said for food and energy. Unfortunately, there are no obvious solutions to food and energy inflation and that implies that correcting it may take longer than anyone would like.

Food inflation is the result of a confluence of events. There are avenues to get food inflation lower, but other than fast shipments from the war zone in Ukraine, there is little that can help that effort in the very near term. Here are the key factors influencing food costs:

  • Inhospitable weather – There is drought in key agricultural areas globally and this spring, planting in the Northern Plains was delayed by late season storms. Great weather this summer would be a huge help.
  • Avian flu – which has resulted in millions of chickens and turkeys being destroyed here in the U.S., but at least this recent outbreak appears to be subsiding. That would help, eventually.
  • The Ukraine War – is disrupting grain supplies from both Ukraine and Russia. There are efforts underway to bring that grain to market, but there is no assurance of success.
  • Fertilizer costs – because natural gas is a key raw material in fertilizer, fertilizer costs have exploded higher. Less fertilizer = lower crop yields. Lower energy costs would certainly help here.

Energy Inflation has the potential to be a longer-term problem. It’s hard to find anything that can provide relief in the near term. The problems outlined below are more structural than cyclical.

  • We appear to be returning to bifurcated, Cold War economies as East and West trade diminishes. In the U.S., COVID brought on the realization that we are far too dependent on China for many strategically important goods. In the EU, the Ukraine War has exposed the dangers of relying on Russia for energy. Neither can be corrected quickly, but the process has clearly begun. World War III has probably begun, but it is an economic war, at least for now. The loss of Russia as an energy source to the West has created an energy shortage in Europe. Attempts to fill that void from the U.S. has migrated the shortage here.
  • U.S. shale producers are not producing as much oil as before the pandemic. For many years producers were rewarded for production growth with rising stock prices, despite very low returns on assets. COVID flipped that idea on its head when oil prices plunged. Once burned, shale producers are now shy about returning to their old ways and have become very focused on producing solid returns, not necessarily rapid production growth. Although U.S. production is rising again, it remains well short of the previous peak.

  • Even if we had more oil, U.S. refining capacity has declined. During the pandemic, refiners suffered substantial losses and as a result, some capacity closed permanently. The difference is about 1 million barrels per day of capacity with little opportunity to replace that lost capacity due to regulations and the associated long lead times required to build new capacity. The shortage of refining capacity, along with the elimination of Russian product imports has driven gas and diesel inventories to very low levels and kept prices higher than implied by crude oil prices. It’s a double whammy at the pump.

Is a Recession a necessary evil?

Energy markets are still beholden to supply and demand and although the opportunity to increase supply is limited, demand can be manipulated. The first tool is prices. If prices rise enough, it will encourage us to use less. That helps, but in our view, it is unlikely to be enough to fully correct the current imbalances. The next tool is recession. Whether recession is the result of the Fed pushing too hard to control inflation or simply the organic result of very high prices doesn’t really matter. The higher energy costs go, the less we have to spend on everything else and the more inclined we are to save rather than spend. Either way, the seeds of a recession are sown. In the 1970’s we learned that when inflation is persistent and ingrained in consumers’ minds, a recession becomes necessary to eliminate that mentality. In that sense, a recession is likely the lesser of two evils when compared with continued inflation.

Both food inflation and particularly energy inflation have the potential to be economy killers. If we are lucky, it can be the pause that refreshes, but more likely, it will be a painful decline. As a result, we remain in the camp of defensive investors. A time to be more aggressive will come, but it isn’t now.

What We’re Reading

If oil prices are off their peaks, why are gas prices still rising?

From Walmart to Gap, Which Retailers Have the Most Excess Inventory?

Why Energy Companies Won’t Produce (Reprint from WSJ Opinion Page)

4 reasons high gas prices aren’t Biden’s fault & one critical way he’s adding to the problem

How Do Big Tech Giants Make Their Billions?

Bird flu is winding down; Iowa’s ag. secretary says recovery will take time

Weekly jobless claims hit 229,000, the highest level since January

Mario Gabelli on navigating market volatility and high energy prices


Palumbo Wealth Management (PWM) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where PWM and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. For additional information, please visit our website at
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio.
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.
The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forwardlooking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.
All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Articles, General News, Weekly Commentary

By: Adam