Crowding Out: Competition for Capital

This week, the Treasury surprised markets when it said it would at least double the maximum size of certain buyback operations for 10- to 30-year securities, raising the cap from $2 billion to “at least” $4 billion per operation. The initial market reaction was straightforward: prices of long-dated Treasuries rose and yields fell sharply. The 30-year yield dropped by roughly 9 basis points before investors reassessed the significance of the move.

The announcement matters less as a standalone policy than as a signal. Treasury says the program is intended to support liquidity in older, less actively traded issues. But the timing suggests concern about a market where long-term yields have risen despite signs of softer economic activity.

That is uncomfortable for both Treasury and the Federal Reserve. Long-term rates shape the cost of mortgages, corporate debt, commercial real estate financing, and infrastructure investment.

Treasury’s action may help at the margin, but it cannot solve the larger problem: mounting competition for long-term capital.

Too Much Borrowing, Finite Capital

The United States is asking investors to absorb enormous quantities of debt. Persistent federal deficits require Treasury to issue securities year after year. The Congressional Budget Office projects a $1.9 trillion federal deficit in fiscal 2026, rising to $3.1 trillion by 2036.

Those needs would be substantial under any circumstances. Now they coincide with another major source of capital demand: the AI data-center buildout. Goldman Sachs estimates that the sector may require roughly $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion in external financing over the next four years.

Not all of that funding will come from public bond markets, and not every dollar raised for AI infrastructure directly displaces a dollar that otherwise would have gone into Treasuries. Still, the direction is clear: governments, companies, data-center developers, utilities, and private-credit lenders are competing for the same scarce resource—investor savings and balance-sheet capacity.

That is crowding out.

Crowding out does not mean investors stop buying Treasuries. It means borrowers must offer more attractive terms to secure capital. In bond markets, more attractive terms generally mean higher yields—raising the cost of long-term borrowing across the economy.

Why Buybacks Cannot Fix It

Larger Treasury buybacks can reduce the market supply of selected long-dated securities while adding Treasury itself as a buyer. In theory, that supports prices and lowers yields.

But scale matters. The latest increase adds at least $14 billion in purchases during the current quarter. That may improve liquidity and temporarily ease pressure in particular maturities, but it is small relative to annual federal borrowing needs and the volume of private-sector investment now underway.

The more meaningful interpretation is that Treasury has shown a willingness to respond when long-dated yields rise sharply. That can affect sentiment. It cannot override the arithmetic of large deficits, heavy refinancing needs, and rising private demand for capital.

Treasury could shift more issuance toward short-term bills, reducing the immediate supply of long-duration debt. But the debt would not disappear. Instead, the government would increase rollover risk by needing to refinance a larger share of its obligations more frequently—and potentially at higher rates if short-term borrowing costs rise.

The Fed’s Difficult Choice

The Federal Reserve may soon face a dilemma it would rather avoid.

Economic growth appears to be softening at the margins. AI infrastructure spending is supporting overall activity, but July retail sales fell 0.6% month over month—the first decline in nine months—while “core” retail sales, a measure of underlying consumer demand, dropped 0.4%. Payrolls declined by 23,000 in July, even as unemployment edged down to 4.1%.

The labor market increasingly looks like a low-hire, low-fire environment: companies are reluctant to add workers, but widespread layoffs have not yet emerged.

Normally, that backdrop would strengthen the case for Fed rate cuts. Inflation, however, remains the constraint. If price pressures prove persistent, cuts could risk reigniting inflation.

That is the central tension: the Fed can lower its policy rate, but it cannot ensure that mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, or long-bond yields will follow.

If investors conclude that the Fed is easing too quickly while Treasury borrowing remains high and private demand for capital continues to grow, long-term yields could rise rather than fall. Investors may demand more compensation for inflation risk, duration risk, fiscal risk—or all three.

The Fed has no easy solution if the sheer demand for capital keeps pushing long-term rates higher.

Have a great week!

What We’re Reading

• $100 Diesel Cracks Signal a Much Tighter Oil Market Than Brent Suggests

• Ray Dalio says Bessent move is sign that a debt crisis is getting closer; recommends gold and bitcoin

• Inside The First Week Of Meta’s Social Media Addiction Trial

Palumbo Wealth Management (PWM) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where PWM and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. For additional information, please visit our website at www.palumbowm.com.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be dependable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be dependable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information, and it should not be relied on as such.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on the market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that no such statements are guarantees of any future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

General News

By: Adam