Build, Back, Better – On the Brink

  • As if we needed more evidence that Congressional mathematics is generally faulty, the CBO analysis of the Build Back Batter plan has a $376 billion gap between costs and revenue. To be fair, the official analysis excludes revenue from increased IRS enforcement. CBO estimated that increased enforcement could produce $200 billion, reducing the revenue shortfall to ‘only’ $167 billion. Also to be fair, these estimates only hold if the temporary programs in the bill are truly temporary and some future Congress allows them to expire. Historically, there are very few examples of government transfer programs being allowed to expire.
  • The bill was passed by the House on Friday and now goes to the primary battleground – the Senate. At last look, Senators Manchin and Sinema were only on board if the bill was fully paid for, as per the CBO. The question now is whether the plan is close enough for them to alter that stance. The pressure is building on these two Senators as they need to balance their popularity at home with the desires of their party.
  • The politics may be unpredictable, but in our view the economics of Build, Back, Better are more clear – It is likely to be inflationary. As 2021 closes, we are in the middle of an inflationary surge brought on by massive fiscal spending (read: giving money to America) colliding with reduced productive capacity due to the pandemic. We don’t argue the need for a dramatic fiscal stimulus to offset the pandemic, but it appears we went too far. That is not a criticism. No one had any clue how much was really needed. This bill, right now, pours more money on the inflationary fire.
  • Unlike the infrastructure bill, which is spread out over 10 years, the roughly $1.63 trillion (CBO estimate) Build Back Better bill is more front loaded as many aspects of the bill are set to expire within a few years, but paid for over 10 years. Much of Build, Back, Better increases transfer payments (read: puts money directly in the hands of the public) and if this is passed right now, it stands to make the current inflationary spiral worse. Creating more demand at a time when productive capacity is already inadequate and COVID shut downs are continuing will only make inflation worse in the short term. There are many admirable aspects of Build, Back, Better, but passage right now is only stimulating additional demand that cannot be met. Too much money chasing too few goods causes higher prices. If passed, we would expect faster economic growth and more rapid inflation. Logically, that would push the Fed towards raising rates sooner.

Don’t Look Now

  • The hope was that the last wave of COVID would mark its demise. That hope appears unfounded as the U.S. is beginning another rise in cases, mostly in northern states. Europe, and particularly Germany and Austria, are hitting new record highs in reported cases. Parts of Asia are experiencing a similar rise. Why is this important? A critical element in repairing the supply demand imbalance is for COVID to recede, allowing production to fully recover. The charts below tell the story, with the exception of China, where data is scarce, but recent news stories are focusing on Delta outbreaks. Getting supply back to normal may take longer than expected. (All charts are from the NY Times.)


What We’re Reading

Global Wealth Surges as China Overtakes U.S. to Grab Top Spot

If Biden picks Brainard over Powell, expect an immediate market impact

4.4 million people quit in Sept. as Great Resignation shows no signs of stopping

I Remember 1970s Inflation. Politicians Should, Too

What’s Wrong With ESG Investing as Explained Through the Medium of Ohio

The Fed Has More Options Than 0% Rates or Recession

SEC rejects VanEck ETF that directly tracks bitcoin

BMO’s Belski: If you take two steps back, you want to own stocks, period

John Deere, Inflation Bellwether

The Real Biden Bill: At Least $4.6 Trillion


Retirement Planning:

Thinking of Joining the Great Resignation? Here’s What to Consider First.

More Americans are quitting their jobs than ever before, and many of them don’t plan to come back to the workplace, even though their finances may suffer as a result.


Estate Planning:

Build Back Better Act I, II, III: Current Version and Trusts and Estates

Three versions of the Act have attempted to make significant changes to current gift, estate, and trust income tax law.



The Best and Worst Juices At The Grocery Store

Some are 100% juice, while others are filled with additional sweeteners.


Palumbo Wealth Management (PWM) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where PWM and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. For additional information, please visit our website at
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product made reference to directly or indirectly in this newsletter, will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), or be suitable for your portfolio.
The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.
The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forwardlooking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.
All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

, , , , ,

Articles, General News, Weekly Commentary

By: Adam