The Yen is Weak. Should We Care?

In late July, Japan and the United States reportedly launched a coordinated currency intervention to support the Japanese yen after it fell to a near 40-year low. The yen weakened sharply in mid-to-late July, reaching almost ¥164 per U.S. dollar after beginning the year near ¥156.

That decline revived a longstanding concern in U.S. bond markets: Japan is the largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasuries. If Tokyo had needed to sell Treasuries to raise dollars and buy yen, a large, sudden sale could have pushed Treasury prices down and U.S. borrowing costs up. That did not happen this time—but the underlying vulnerability remains.

Why a Weak Yen Matters

A weak yen affects both Japan and the United States.

Japanese inflation: A cheaper yen makes Japanese exports more competitive abroad, but it makes imported energy, food, raw materials, and other wholesale goods more expensive. That imports inflation, squeezes businesses’ costs, and reduces households’ purchasing power.
U.S.–Japan trade tensions: A weaker yen lowers the dollar price of Japanese exports, giving Japanese producers a cost advantage in the U.S. market. In a U.S. political environment focused on tariffs and trade imbalances, that can fuel friction.
Pressure on U.S. interest rates: The most immediate U.S. risk is that Japan might sell Treasuries to finance yen-support operations. Heavy Treasury sales would increase supply in an already-sensitive market, potentially lifting yields and raising borrowing costs for the federal government, businesses, and consumers.

How the Intervention Worked

The intervention appears to have been structured specifically to support the yen without destabilizing the U.S. Treasury market.

The United States sold euros and bought yen: Rather than sell U.S. dollars, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reportedly sold an estimated $5 billion to $10 billion of euros from reserve holdings to purchase yen. That supported the yen while avoiding a direct disruption to dollar funding or Treasury-market liquidity.
Japan carried most of the burden: Tokyo reportedly sold roughly $59 billion of foreign-exchange reserves on July 30 to buy yen aggressively. Crucially, it did not need to sell Treasuries in the open market to generate the required cash.
Japan used the FIMA Repo Facility: The Bank of Japan could temporarily exchange U.S. Treasuries for dollars through the Federal Reserve’s Foreign and International Monetary Authorities repo facility. In effect, Japan pledged Treasuries as collateral in return for short-term dollar liquidity. That allowed it to fund intervention without dumping bonds into the secondary Treasury market.

This was an important distinction. Had Japan sold $59 billion of Treasuries outright, the sudden additional supply could have driven Treasury prices lower and yields higher. The FIMA facility avoided that outcome—for now.

A Temporary Bandage

The immediate market reaction was favorable. The yen strengthened from nearly ¥164 per dollar to approximately ¥155–¥156 within days. But intervention changes near-term supply and demand; it does not solve the economic forces that drove the yen lower in the first palce.

The central issue is the interest-rate gap between the United States and Japan.

U.S. interest rates remain comparatively high, with 10-year Treasury yields near 4.68%. (Source: CNBC; 8/14)
Japanese rates remain much lower, even after the Bank of Japan moved away from negative rates. Ten-year Japanese government bonds yield roughly 2.88%. (Source: CNBC; 8/14)

That spread encourages the yen carry trade: investors borrow cheaply in yen, convert the proceeds into dollars, and buy higher-yielding U.S. assets such as Treasuries. The trade creates recurring selling pressure on the yen and persistent demand for Treasuries.

As long as the yield gap remains wide, intervention can slow the yen’s decline, but it is unlikely to reverse the broader trend permanently. Markets are likely to continue testing whether Japanese and U.S. authorities are willing to intervene again.

The U.S. Trade-off

The yen carry trade is not only a problem for Japan—it is also an indirect source of funding for the United States. Cheap Japanese capital can flow into U.S. Treasuries and other dollar assets, helping absorb the enormous volume of debt issued to finance U.S. budget deficits.

If the U.S.–Japan rate differential narrowed sharply, the carry trade could unwind. That could reduce foreign demand for Treasuries just as the U.S. government continues to borrow heavily. In that scenario, Treasury yields would likely need to rise to attract sufficient capital.

So, yes, a weak yen matters. It can raise inflation and political challenges in Japan, complicates U.S.–Japan trade relations, and exposes an uncomfortable dependency in U.S. bond markets: the same rate gap that weakens the yen also helps finance America’s debt.

Have a great week!

What We’re Reading

Palumbo Wealth Management (PWM) is a registered investment advisor. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where PWM and its representatives are properly licensed or exempt from licensure. For additional information, please visit our website at www.palumbowm.com.

The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status, or investment horizon. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be dependable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability, or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such.

The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on the market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that no such statements are guarantees of any future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.

Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

budget deficit, currency intervention, deficit spending, Federal deficit, japan intervention, Treasury Bonds, US Treasuries, Yen, Yen Carry Trade

General News

By: Adam